Can Direct Pay Permits Solve the Internet Sales Tax Problem?

States have been hemorrhaging sales tax revenue for years and have been looking for solutions. It’s possible, however, they’ve had access to a solution all along that would completely change the way we pay sales and use tax while helping to correct the e-commerce sales tax problem. As it stands now, some companies use what’s called a Direct Pay Permit, or a DPP, to buy goods without having to pay sales tax on the purchase and self impose use tax instead. DPPs might provide an easier method for tax collection, taxability and situsing, although it would require changes to how the tax software systems work. A company can obtain a DPP for a number of reasons but it all revolves around the ideas behind taxability.

Taxability is, of course, determined by the nature of the goods being sold and where they are ultimately used. When a company can’t say the nature of how the goods will be used at the time of purchase, it is impossible to determine taxability at the sale. The same goes when a company doesn’t know where the goods will be used, as the sales tax jurisdiction can’t be determined. These are the two main instances when a company can use a DPP. When a company uses a DPP, they remit sales tax accordingly after the final use or location of use is determined. It is more accurate for a single company to determine it own taxability than to have vendors trying to make decisions for transactions when they don’t know all the information.

To solve the ecommerce sales tax crisis, states could change over to a full DPP system where use tax is paid by the company after the sale directly to the tax jurisdiction. There are a few caveats to this idea, however. First, the current use tax system of some companies would not work because their software for use tax is not as automated like sales tax software. Another problem is that companies might have a hard time adjusting to this format of paying for use tax. The accounting is different as steps are need to add use tax to the total purchase price of capital assets to get to full depreciable value. The problem is much trickier to solve, since the DPP concept is new to many taxpayers. However, the benefits of a DPP based system that’s closely monitored might outweigh the costs and hardships endured when the system was first implemented. States can win against e-commerce by collecting tax correctly and reducing the audits and audit cycles. States would see a higher percentage of tax collection and accuracy and lose far less when auditing only targets high revenue companies or problematic returns.

Latest Articles

Senate Finance Committee Examines Wayfair Decision

Senate Finance Committee Examines Wayfair Decision

The Wayfair decision Four years ago, the Supreme Court's decision in South Dakota vs. Wayfair changed everything about sales tax compliance for businesses with revenue from multiple states. Instead of being responsible only for transactions in states...

read more
Do We Still Care about Physical Nexus?

Do We Still Care about Physical Nexus?

The new nexus Before the Supreme Court's decision in South Dakota vs. Wayfair, remote sellers only had to collect sales tax when they had a physical presence in a jurisdiction. A store, a warehouse full of your products, affiliate sellers -- these...

read more
Sales Tax and Barter

Sales Tax and Barter

a The Barter Life It used to be that businesses only had to collect and file sales taxes if they had a physical presence in a state: an office, a store, a warehouse, or a factory, for example. A small business using e-commerce to sell in other states or...

read more